A gene-editing first: scientists tried CRISPR to fight HIV
Scientists are reporting the first use of the gene-editing tool CRISPR to try to cure a patient’s HIV infection by providing blood cells that were altered to resist the AIDS virus.
The gene-editing tool has long been used in research labs, and a Chinese scientist was scorned last year when he revealed he used it on embryos that led to the birth of twin girls. Editing embryos is considered too risky, partly because the DNA changes can pass to future generations.
Wednesday’s report in the New England Journal of Medicine, by different Chinese researchers, is the first published account of using CRISPR to treat a disease in an adult, where the DNA changes are confined to that person.
The attempt was successful in some ways but fell short of being an HIV cure.
Still, it shows that gene editing holds promise and seems precise and safe in this patient so far, said Dr. Carl June, a University of Pennsylvania genetics expert who wrote a commentary in the journal.
“That’s really good for the field,” June said.
Chinese government grants paid for the research, which was done openly with advance notice on a scientific registry and standard informed consent procedures. Some of those steps were missing or questioned in last year’s embryo work.
“There are no ethical concerns on this one,” June said.
Gene editing permanently alters DNA, the code of life. CRISPR is a relatively new tool scientists can use to cut DNA at a specific spot.
The new case involves a 27-year-old man with HIV who needed a blood stem cell transplant to treat cancer. Previously, two other men were apparently cured of both diseases by transplants from donors with natural resistance to HIV because they have a gene mutation that prevents HIV from entering cells. Since donors like this are very rare, the Chinese scientists tried to create similar HIV resistance by “editing” that gene in blood cells in the lab to try to mimic the mutation.
The transplant put the man’s cancer in remission, and the cells that were altered to resist HIV are still working 19 months later. But they comprise only 5% to 8% of such blood cells, so they’re outnumbered by ones that can still be infected.
“They need to approach 90% or more, I think, to actually have a chance of curing HIV,” June said.
Scientists are testing various ways to make the gene editing more efficient, and “our results show the proof of principle” for this approach, one study leader, Hongkui Deng of Peking University in Beijing, wrote in an email.
One very encouraging result: multiple tests show that the editing did not have unintended effects on other genes.
“One of the concerns is that they could make a Frankenstein cell, that they would hit other genes instead of the intended target,” so it’s good that this did not happen, June said.
China appears to be moving fast on such research and may get treatments approved sooner than the United States, June said. He has financial ties to some gene therapy companies and is leading a different study testing CRISPR to fight cancer in the U.S. Three patients have been treated so far and some results are expected by the end of this year.
Several other U.S. studies have been trying to control HIV by altering patients’ own blood cells using a different gene editing tool called zinc finger nucleases. The first such test began a decade ago in the U.S.
Posting of this article is courtesy of the Associated Press (AP). The article originally appeared as part of the AP’s Health & Science reporting, which is supported by the HHMI Department of Science Education.
Related Science News
Desperate to solve the deadly conundrum of COVID-19, the world is clamoring for fast answers and solutions from a research system not built for haste.
Testing is critical to controlling the coronavirus and eventually easing restrictions that have halted daily life for most Americans. But there’s been confusion about what kinds of tests are available and what they actually measure.
Across the U.S. and in Europe, researchers and health officials say they can track the course of a community outbreak of the new coronavirus by studying the waste flushed from its bathrooms. And that can provide a valuable addition to public health tools, they say.