Cougars and Trees in a Trophic Cascade

Topic
Resource Type
Description
This activity guides the analysis of a published scientific figure from a study that investigated the effects of tourism on cougars and cottonwood trees in a national park.
In 1918, Utah’s Zion National Park was established to protect forests and rivers from human activity. But as more tourists began visiting the park, they displaced cougars (mountain lions), the top predator of herbivores called mule deer, from certain areas. In this study, scientists compared vegetation in areas of the park with and without cougars. The figure shows the age structure of cottonwood trees found in the park in 2015. Panel A shows trees from an area where cougars were common, and Panel B shows trees from an area where cougars were rare. The “Educator Materials” document includes a captioned figure, background information, graph interpretation, and discussion questions. The “Student Handout” includes a captioned figure and background information. The original article is also provided as a download.
The “Resource Google Folder” link directs to a Google Drive folder of resource documents in the Google Docs format. Not all downloadable documents for the resource may be available in this format. The Google Drive folder is set as “View Only”; to save a copy of a document in this folder to your Google Drive, open that document, then select File → “Make a copy.” These documents can be copied, modified, and distributed online following the Terms of Use listed in the “Details” section below, including crediting BioInteractive.
Student Learning Targets
- Analyze and interpret data from a scientific figure.
- Describe how changes in one population in an ecosystem can impact other populations through a trophic cascade.
Estimated Time
Key Terms
age class, bar graph, biodiversity, error bar, food chain, germination, herbivory, predator, prey, trend line
Primary Literature
Beschta, Robert L., and William J. Ripple. “The Role of Large Predators in Maintaining Riparian Plant Communities and River Morphology.” Geomorphology 157–158 (2012): 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.04.042.
Terms of Use
Please see the Terms of Use for information on how this resource can be used.
Accessibility Level (WCAG compliance)
Version History
NGSS (2013)
HS-LS2-2; SEP2, SEP4, SEP5
AP Biology (2019)
ENE-1.N, ENE-4.B; SP1, SP4
IB Biology (2016)
4.1, C.2, C.3
AP Environmental Science (2020)
Topic(s): 1.1, 1.9, 1.11, 2.1, 8.2
Learning Objectives & Practices: ENG-1.B, ENG-1.D, ERT-2.A, STB-3.B, ENG-1.D, SP2, SP5, SP7
IB Environmental Systems and Societies (2017)
2.2
Common Core (2010)
ELA.RST.9-12.7
Math.S-ID.6, Math.S-IC.4; MP2, MP5
Vision and Change (2009)
CC5; DP2, DP3